Telehealth Adoption and Perspectives Among Pediatric Otolaryngologists Following the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVES: To assess use of and physician experiences with pediatric otolaryngology telehealth visits as impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Cross sectional survey. METHODS: A 15-question survey was electronically distributed to 656 members of the American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology in August 2021, addressing member demographics, experiential practice elements, and use pre-pandemic, during the initial shutdown period of March-May 2020, and current use at the time of survey inquiry. RESULTS: There were 124 respondents (response rate = 18.9%). Incident use pre-pandemic and during the shutdown were 21.0% (n = 26), and 92.7% (n = 115), respectively. Current use was 83.9% (n = 104) and the percentage of new current users (79.5%, n = 78) was significant (P < .0001,95% CI = 70.6%-86.4%). Estimated median telehealth visit rates pre-pandemic, during shutdown, and currently were 0 to 1, 4 to 5, and 2 to 3 per week, respectively (P < .0001). A difference in post-covid adoption rates was noted only for location (P = .008), with no differences for years out of training or practice type. Compared to in-person visits, physician satisfaction with telehealth visits was rated equivalent (49.0%) or worse/much worse (48.1%). The most common telehealth uses were follow-up visits (83.7%), pre-operative counseling (76.9%), and post-operative evaluation (69.2%). The need for a detailed exam (89.4%) and initial visits (32.7%) were reasons a telehealth visit was not offered. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic appears to have precipitated a rapid increase in telehealth adoption among surveyed pediatric otolaryngologists, regardless of age or practice type. The most significant limitations remain the need for a detailed exam, perceived low patient technological literacy, and limitations to interpretive services. Technology-based optimization of these barriers could lead to increased use and physician satisfaction.

Impact of the novel coronavirus on surgical practices at a tertiary pediatric hospital: A 3 year cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) forced unprecedented changes in pediatric otolaryngology workflow in the early pandemic, particularly due to the postponement of elective procedures. In turn, this has impacted timely treatment of patients and ability to train residents and fellows. The objective is to characterize how surgical practices in pediatric otolaryngology have been impacted by the pandemic through a cross sectional analysis over three years. METHODS: This cross-sectional study focuses on patients who underwent surgical procedures within the department of otolaryngology at a single tertiary pediatric hospital. Descriptive statistical analysis was used to compare subsets of patients from pre-pandemic in 2019, early-pandemic in 2020, and late-pandemic in 2021. RESULTS: Operative volume decreased by 87.57% in the early pandemic and 36.86% in the late pandemic. In the early pandemic, the greatest decreases were seen in airway reconstruction (100%), adenotonsillectomy (96.4%), adenoidectomy (94.7%), myringotomy with tympanostomy tube insertion (94.6%), frenulectomy (94.1%), and sinonasal procedures (93.3%), while in the late-pandemic adenotonsillectomy (42.4%) and myringotomy with tympanostomy tube insertion (70.1%) remained reduced when compared to pre-pandemic volume. Increased average case lengths in the early-pandemic (78.28 ± 51.95 min) and late-pandemic (71.91 ± 70.76 min) were observed when compared to pre-pandemic (52.26 ± 39.20 min) (p < 0.001). An increased proportion of multidisciplinary cases were completed in 2020 and 2021 (p < 0.001). In the 2020, 25% of cases were completed without trainee involvement. There was an overall decrease in case numbers for trainees and increase in cases without their involvement when compared to 2019 and 2021. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a decrease in pediatric otolaryngology surgical procedures, particularly at the onset of the pandemic. While surgical trainees saw a dramatic reduction in case numbers early on, one year into the pandemic case volume is increasing and trending to pre-pandemic numbers. More complex cases, as represented by patients requiring longer operative times, inpatient status, and more frequently multidisciplinary care, were seen in the early pandemic, while drastic reductions were seen in routine outpatient procedures.

Oropharyngeal hemorrhage in patients with COVID-19: A multi-institutional case series.

BACKGROUND: Patients with COVID-19 who are intubated and require mechanical ventilation have been observed to have oropharyngeal bleeding necessitating otolaryngology intervention. METHODS: We report five cases of oropharyngeal hemorrhage in COVID-19 patients on mechanical ventilation requiring evaluation by otolaryngologists at George Washington University Hospital (GWUH) and Boston Medical Center (BMC) from March to April 2020. Institutional Review Board at both institutions exempted this study from informed consent because there were no identifiable patient characteristics, photographs, or imaging studies included. RESULTS: All five patients were managed conservatively; four required packing with Kerlix gauze by an otolaryngologist. Two patients had the additional requirement of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and associated anticoagulation. Three patients improved with oropharyngeal packing; two had persistent bleeding. Three patients expired. Endotracheal tubes were repositioned less frequently due to the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Intubated patients with COVID-19 may have an increased risk of oropharyngeal hemorrhage. This may be due to anticoagulation, prolonged intubation, or decreased frequency of endotracheal tube repositioning. Otolaryngologists should wear appropriate PPE when managing this hemorrhagic complication.